Air Force Major Commits Crime on Camera, CNN Books Him as a Constitutional Scholar

0
Air Force Major Commits Crime on Camera, CNN Books Him as a Constitutional Scholar

On July 1, Air Force Major Jason Watson stood on the Capitol steps in full military uniform, called for the impeachment and removal of President Trump and Vice President Vance, got arrested on camera, and somehow ended up with a primetime CNN interview six weeks later.

That's not a career path. That's a CNN audition reel.

Watson was arrested and charged with "Crowding, Obstructing, and Incommoding" after delivering remarks at a press conference organized by the Removal Coalition, a lobbying group that pushes Congress to impeach the president. He identified himself as active-duty military while wearing his uniform — a direct violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which prohibits service members from participating in political activities in uniform and from using "contemptuous language towards the President, Vice President, the Secretaries of War and of a military department, Congress, and certain other officials."

Watson now faces a court-martial. The Removal Coalition's founder, Jessica Denson, has said she expects "significant charges to be filed." Rep. Al Green, the Texas Democrat who has made impeachment his entire personality since roughly 2017, was the only member of Congress present at the event.

Watson told the crowd, "I'm here with him because Rep. Green is the only member of Congress that has demonstrated the courage and conviction to force a vote on articles of impeachment." He added, "If Congress followed his example, we could remove the entire Trump administration, but Congress remains unconvinced of the urgency and necessity for them to honor their oaths."

So CNN's Erin Burnett booked him for an interview. Not as a man facing criminal charges and military prosecution. As a brave truth-teller.

Watson told Burnett that President Trump is "flagrantly violating the Constitution" and that he wanted to "inspire people and bring the conversation to impeach, convict, remove." He claimed his actions were motivated by the Iran conflict, asserting that "these violations resulted in the deaths of 13 service members and injuries of hundreds more." Then he landed the line CNN clearly brought him on to deliver: "I believe we can defeat this government if we just take a stand."

Burnett offered minimal pushback. No mention of the UCMJ. No serious questioning about what happens when active-duty officers freelance their own foreign policy positions in uniform on the Capitol steps. No exploration of the fact that "defeating this government" is a phrase that means something very specific when a uniformed military officer says it on national television. No talk about what happens if Iran gets a nuclear weapon.

The pipeline here is well-worn. A service member breaks the chain of command, violates regulations designed to keep the military apolitical, gets arrested — and the reward is a sympathetic cable news segment where the host treats insubordination as patriotism. The uniform isn't incidental. It's the whole point. Watson in a polo shirt doesn't get booked on CNN. Watson in dress blues, facing a court-martial, with the Capitol steps behind him — that's the shot.

As reported by MRCTV, the interview ran with almost no adversarial framing. Burnett let Watson present himself as a man "motivated by the Constitution" without pressing him on the part of the Constitution that establishes civilian control of the military, or the part that gives Congress — not individual majors — the power of impeachment.

The UCMJ exists for a reason. It keeps the military out of politics, which keeps politics out of the military. Every officer who puts on the uniform and holds a press conference calling for the removal of an elected president chips away at that wall. And every anchor who frames that act as courage instead of what it actually is — a crime — helps knock out another brick.

Watson swore an oath to the Constitution. So did every other officer in the armed forces. The difference is that most of them understand the oath includes the parts about lawful authority and civilian command — not just the parts that play well on cable.


Most Popular

Most Popular

No posts to display